Title: “67 Wildwood Ave.”
Medium: Mixed Media on Canvas
Dimensions: 48×48 inces
This mixed-media piece evokes a serene landscape at first glance—vivid horizontal blocks of textured white, tranquil turquoise, and earthen tones suggest sky, water, and land. But beneath its minimalist surface lies a deeply charged narrative. At the heart of the work stand five small, uniform houses—four painted white, one black—neatly aligned like silent witnesses or characters in an unresolved drama. Their stark simplicity draws the eye immediately to the black house, a striking center of contrast and isolation.
The texture above—fragmented, fossil-like, and peeling—resembles both the scars of time and the fragility of social veneers. It’s an intentional choice: the surface is literally cracking under the weight of history. Below, the colors become more structured, clean, and modern—perhaps alluding to the suburban idealism of early 20th-century planned communities.
But this is no utopian vision. This is a confrontation.
Interpretation & Historical Context: The Story of Sidney Dearing in Piedmont (1924–1925):
This piece references a haunting chapter in the history of Piedmont, California—a city that branded itself as a “City of Homes,” yet worked systematically to exclude Black residents. In 1924, Sidney Dearing, a successful Black homeowner and entrepreneur, purchased a home in Piedmont with his wife, Irene, through a white proxy since restrictive covenants and social norms of the time aimed to keep Piedmont racially homogenous.
The reaction from the city and its white residents was swift and violent. Dearing and his family faced harassment, threats, and relentless pressure. Despite having every legal right to live there, the city used fear and intimidation to force the family to sell. By 1925, under duress, the Dearings were compelled to leave.
The single black house in the painting is emblematic of Sidney Dearing’s home: conspicuous, centered, and unjustly alienated. Its very presence disrupts the visual harmony—just as Dearing’s presence disrupted the social contract of a white-only enclave, revealing its fragility and intolerance. The surrounding white homes appear almost complicit, boxed in tight formation, unmoved by the tension they create.
This work isn't merely an aesthetic exercise—it’s a challenge. It asks the viewer: What is belonging? Who decides who gets to live where? And more uncomfortably: How far have we really come since 1925?
By juxtaposing clean modernist lines with brutal historical reference, the artist has transformed a minimalist landscape into a quiet indictment of racial exclusion and the whitewashing of American suburbia. The black house does not shout—but it doesn’t have to. Its presence alone is revolutionary.